The "I Can't Believe It's AGW Again" blog.
byon 02-24-2014 at 06:00 PM (21982 Views)
This is my second attempt at a blog. I've noticed a resistance to have anything AGW related in the main blog, and that's fine. So to avoid further friction, this is a place to post things about AGW that you wouldn't want to annoy anyone with in the main blog. Enjoy or not, as you wish. If you don't want to hear about AGW, then don't visit. This blog will attempt to comply with every aspect of the "Dewey self moderation program policies" imposed earlier last year.
My opinions on AGW will become apparent as comment get posted and discussed. At some later time I may begin to populate the blog here with some links or graphics if I think they are relevant.
Post anything you like as long as you can back it up with reality, not emotion. This topic does get emotional for some as the entire subject is 'faith based'. ...and you can't alter a persons 'beliefs' or 'faith'. If a child believes in the tooth fairy, then the tooth fairy must exist: for that child.
Personal insults are unnecessary in a technical discussion, they won't be tolerated unless they are humorous enough to be justified as entertainment. Shouting someone down is just a pathetic tactic used by those who can't handle FACTS. And remember that those who can't handle the truth are most easily identified as those who try to silence the ones speaking it.
Think of it this way. If your bookie came to you and said 'I have a sure winner in this years championship game! Bet everything on Team-X' ,,,So you do, and team X loses all your money. 'No propblem' he says next year. "This year I have the sure winner in the championship. Bet everything on Team-X'. ...and you do it again. and again Team-X loses all of your money. Well no problem. Next year he has teh sure winner again!! It's team-X, and he wants you to bet the house on Team-X. Well this time you don't bet, but sure enough, Team-X loses again. It's called "CREDIBILITY" folks.
Why did I set this up with a sports scenario? It's too easy. For over twenty years the AGW believers have have been predicting global temperature increases with increasing atmospheric CO2. Now atmospheric CO2 has been increasing, that is a fact. But the global temperature has not. Well for the first few years that can be explained and ignored as a fluke or the models need tuning or something. But for over TWENTY YEARS the models have been wrong. Here's the point. Would you bet on a proven failure of a bookie for twenty years? Of course not. He has no credibility. Then why would you advocate global tax policy based on a proven failure?
Not only do the AGW religionists have absolutely no science to back up their beliefs, they don't have any CREDIBILITY at all either.
Play nice everyone!!!